Re: Solaris Performance - Mailing list pgsql-general

From P.J. \"Josh\" Rovero
Subject Re: Solaris Performance
Date
Msg-id 3C5EF813.7040503@sonalysts.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Solaris Performance  ("P.J. \"Josh\" Rovero" <rovero@sonalysts.com>)
Responses Re: Solaris Performance  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Solaris Performance  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Solaris Performance  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
For non-postgresql applications, the Suns are
typically faster than the HPs.  While direct
comparisons are always dangerous, the SPARC
chips are clocked at about 2-3 times what
the PA-RISC chips are.

The postgresql performance on Solaris is
an order of magnitude (10x) slower than
Linux x86 at same CPU clock speed.

Tom Lane wrote:

> "P.J. \"Josh\" Rovero" <rovero@sonalysts.com> writes:
>
>>We've been running equivalent configurations and schema on
>>HP-UX, Solaris, and x86 Linux, and benchmarking with
>>pgbench and some application-specific data.  All testing
>>was with 7.2rc2, and all were built natively on each platform.
>>
>
>>Performance on Solaris (2.6 and 2.7) seems lackluster,
>>
>
> Seeing as how those are three different hardware platforms, one must
> wonder how sure you are that you are comparing apples to apples.
> A difference in CPU speed or disk speed could explain everything.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
>
>


--
P. J. "Josh" Rovero                                 Sonalysts, Inc.
Email: rovero@sonalysts.com    www.sonalysts.com    215 Parkway North
Work: (860)326-3671 or 442-4355                     Waterford CT 06385
***********************************************************************


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Solaris Performance
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Solaris Performance