Re: best way to use bitvarying? - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Barry Lind
Subject Re: best way to use bitvarying?
Date
Msg-id 3C3B313B.1000808@xythos.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: best way to use bitvarying?  (Laurette Cisneros <laurette@nextbus.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Laurette,

bytea is supported in 7.2, and the 7.2 drivers will work against either
a 7.1 or 7.2 database.  You can download the latest 7.2 drivers from
jdbc.postgresql.org.

thanks,
--Barry

Laurette Cisneros wrote:

> Last I was hearing (see http://lab.applinet.nl/postgresql-jdbc/#Lob) "bytea
> is currently unsupported in the jdbc interface".  Is this not true for 7.2?
> Is there a suggested way of using this with jdbc?
>
> Thanks for the help,
>
> L.
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
>>Laurette Cisneros <laurette@nextbus.com> writes:
>>
>>>We would like to store *small* images into bitvarying fields.
>>>
>>Wouldn't BYTEA be a better choice?  Do you really want to treat the data
>>a bit at a time, rather than a byte at a time?
>>
>>            regards, tom lane
>>
>>
>



pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Anil Jangam
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature enquiry in pgsql driver.
Next
From: Barry Lind
Date:
Subject: Re: Failure in timestamptz of JDBC of 7.2b4