Tom Lane wrote:
>
> These things look like bugs to me:
>
> heap_xlog_clean doesn't update the page's LSN and SUI.
>
> heap_xlog_insert and heap_xlog_update leave random bits in the
> inserted/updated tuple's t_ctid. heap_xlog_update leaves random
> bits in the updated tuple's t_cmax in the "move" case.
As far as I see, t_cmax isn't used anywhere once a tuple
was committed.
>
> I am not sure about what sort of visible fault these omissions could
> produce; perhaps none. But they look like dangerous things IMHO.
> Comments?
I'm not sure about the heap_xlog_clean case. Updating
LSN and SUI seems better to me.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
