Re: Explicit configuration file - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: Explicit configuration file
Date
Msg-id 3C1620A8.A09F36A2@fourpalms.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Explicit configuration file  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Explicit configuration file  (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
...
> Isn't it easier to just use symlinks?

Maybe. Sometimes. In some cases. But even in those cases, easier is not
always better.

We've had "the symlink discussion" from time to time in the past. Some
folks are very comfortable with symlinks as part of the PostgreSQL
design model. But I'm *very* uncomfortable with symlinks in that role.

istm that Mark's suggestion for a command line option to specify a
configuration file (hmm, probably one or two more too) is well within
the scope of a reasonable feature for a good user interface. Configuring
a system should not require creating symlinks imho, especially not by
hand.
                      - Thomas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: New Port targetting NetWare
Next
From: Marko Kreen
Date:
Subject: Restoring large tables with COPY