Re: java stored procedures - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Laszlo Hornyak
Subject Re: java stored procedures
Date
Msg-id 3C0C937E.9000405@freemail.hu
Whole thread Raw
In response to java stored procedures  (Laszlo Hornyak <hornyakl@freemail.hu>)
List pgsql-general
Hi!

I am such a lame in the licensing area. As much as I know, BSD license
is more free than GPL. I think it is too early to think about licensing,
but it`s ok, you won :), when it will be ready(or it will seem to get
closer to a working thing, currently it looks more like a interresting
test), I will ask you if you want to distribute it with Postgres, and if
you say yes, the license will be the same as Postgresql`s license.
Anyway is this neccessary when it is the part of the distribution?
Is this ok for you?

thanks,
Laszlo Hornyak

ps: still waiting for your ideas, suggestions, etc :) I am not memeber
of the mailing list, please write me dirrectly!

Barry Lind wrote:

> Laszlo,
>
> In my mind it would be more useful if this code was under the same
> license as the rest of postgresql.  That way it could become part of
> the product as opposed to always being a separate component.  (Just
> like plpgsql, pltcl and the other procedural languages).
>
> thanks,
> --Barry
>
>



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: colum@mail.com (colm)
Date:
Subject: RedHat6.2 - postgres 7.1.2 lib confusion
Next
From: Tom Innes
Date:
Subject: When will JDBC support error codes?