Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hannu Krosing
Subject Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong
Date
Msg-id 3BFAD15A.5040507@tm.ee
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong
List pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>>>>There have been three ideas of what octet_length() sould return:
>>>>      1) compressed on-disk storage length
>>>>      2) byte length in server-side encoding
>>>>      3) byte length in client-side encoding
>>>>
>>...
>>
>>>>The open question is whether we should be doing #3.
>>>>
>>There is no question in my mind that (3) must be the result of
>>octet_length(). Any of the other options may give an interesting result,
>>but of no practical use to a client trying to retrieve data. And
>>everything is a client!
>>
>
>Also added to TODO:
>
>    * Make octet_length_client the same as octet_length() 
>
Will this break backward compatibility ?

-------------
Hannu



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Manuel Sugawara
Date:
Subject: broken time operator?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong