...
> Sure, I said *after* we fail to find an exact match. But the "freebie"
> match is for a function name that matches a type name and is
> binary-compatible with the source type. That's not a weak constraint.
> ISTM that interpretation should take priority over interpretations that
> involve more than one level of transformation.
Ah, OK I think. If there is a counterexample, it is probably no less
obscure than this one.
- Thomas
