Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>
> I did some benchmarking with/without multibyte support using current.
...
> (2) pgbench
>
> With multibyte support(first column is the concurrent user, second is
> the TPS):
...
> 32 95.947363
> 64 92.718780
> 128 61.725883
>
> Witout multibyte support:
...
> 32 92.283645
> 64 86.936559
> 128 87.584099
Do you have any theory why multibyte passes non-mb at 128 ?
Some subtle timing thing perhaps (or just bad luck for non-mb at 128)?
-----------
Hannu
