Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
>
> Is this the way we should proceed with pgAdmin II?
> Is anyone planning a real dependency table based on object STRING NAMES?
>
> We need some advice:
> 1) Client solution: should we add the rebuilding feature to pgAdmin II?
> 2) Server solution: should we wait until the ALTER OBJECT project is complete?
>
> Please advice. Help needed.
> Vote for (1) or (2).
I vote for (2).
It's the server's resposibitiy to ensure the db's consistency.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
