Guy Fraser wrote:
>As you will see below, I think the "spelling" is a waste of CPU and
>time.
>
I don't use CPU time for spelling :)
>>...frequent the spelling errors are on this page, one might reasonable
>>assume that you could...
>>
>
>You can "reasonable assume" incorrect spelling is OK if you are a total
>moron.
>
>Note: "reasonable assume" should be "reasonably assume" for the non
>illiterate.
>
Yes, I'm rather red-faced about that typo. I fully intended to put a
'y' there, not an 'e'.
>>selected * frm tabloid wear valued be 'huh?';
>>
>
>Boy! You would have to be very "spelling challenged" to come up with
>that.
>
Actually that statement was half aimed at spelling and half a pot shot
at the article.
Only a few people got the pun.
David
--
>:>
I may have the information you need and I may choose only HTML. It's up to you.
