Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Neil Padgett
Subject Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Date
Msg-id 3B7AE7FD.B2268CD1@redhat.com
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > > Attached please find:
> > > >
> > > >       the original proposal to encrypt pg_shadow
> > > >       a diff of the current CVS
> > > >       two new files (backend/libpq/md5.c and include/libpq/md5.h)
> > > >               which implement MD5 encryption (from Vince with cleanups)
> > > >
> > >
> > > Patch applied. I have to move on to SCM patch.
> >
> > Hmm... I used to be able to build in a separate tree than my source
> > tree. Since this patch was applied, I can't. It seems that the
> > preprocessor is finding the system md5.h (i.e. /usr/include/md5.h)
> > rather than the PostgreSQL md5.h. Suggestions on how to fix?
>
> OK, I move the contents of md5.h into crypt.h.  There wasn't much in
> there anyway.

Great. I can build again. =)

Neil

--
Neil Padgett
Red Hat Canada Ltd.                       E-Mail:  npadgett@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300,
Toronto, ON  M4P 2C9

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix for fetchone() and fetchmany() in Python interface
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords