Perhaps change the documentation instead so it reflects this is a
deprecated feature that one day may be resurrected?
IMHO, totally removing reference to it in the documentation will confuse
people who have come across it before and wondered where it went.
+ Justin
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > > That's what I though, too. My concern is mostly that this clause should
> > > be optional,
> >
> > Oh. No objection to that --- just drop an empty string into the
> > pg_language column if it's omitted.
>
> Also, should we remove documentation about the field. Confusing to
> document something that is meaningless.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there." - Indira Gandhi
