Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From MauMau
Subject Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
Date
Msg-id 3B3968D184E74416962BA7EB9ECB2510@maumau
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
List pgsql-hackers
From: "Greg Stark" <stark@mit.edu>
> On the client end the FATAL is pretty logical but in the logs it makes
> it sound like the entire server died. Especially in this day of
> multithreaded servers. I was suggesting that that was the origin of
> the confusion here. Anyone who has seen these messages on the client
> end many times might interpret them correctly in the server logs but
> someone who has only been a DBA, not a database user might never have
> seen them except in the server logs and without the context might not
> realize that FATAL is a term of art peculiar to Postgres.

I think so, too.
My customers and colleagues, who are relatively new to PostgreSQL, asked 
like "Is this FATAL message a sign of some problem?  What does it mean?"  I 
think it's natural to show concern when finding FATAL messages.  I find it 
unnatural for a normal administration operation to emit a FATAL message.

Regards
MauMau




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "MauMau"
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good