Re: WAL and backup recovery - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Dario Brignardello
Subject Re: WAL and backup recovery
Date
Msg-id 3B0BF95A.B7E41D39@sinectis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to WAL and backup recovery  (Dario Brignardello <dbrignar@sinectis.com>)
List pgsql-admin
Thanks for your help, its working now :-).
Yours:
Dario Brignardello


Tom Lane wrote:

> Dario Brignardello <dbrignar@sinectis.com> writes:
> >       checkpoint_segments = 1
> >       checkpoint_timeout = 30
>
> Reducing checkpoint_segments and checkpoint_timeout is actually
> seriously counterproductive, if your problem is amount of disk space
> chewed up by WAL logs during a long transaction (such as bulk load of
> a big table).  The WAL log cannot be truncated until the xact commits,
> so the checkpoints that happen meanwhile just cause log bloat.  Lots
> of it, because each checkpoint causes fresh copying of modified pages
> into the WAL log.
>
> Try increasing those numbers, not decreasing them.  Maybe 10/600 or so?
>
> Also, if you are short on disk space for WAL, increasing wal_files isn't
> such a great idea either.
>
>                         regards, tom lane

Attachment

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: "Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos"
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL and backup recovery
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres 7.0.3 Dying