Re: Shared library versions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark L. Woodward
Subject Re: Shared library versions
Date
Msg-id 3AFBBFDB.C77DCACD@mohawksoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Shared library versions  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > On Wed, 9 May 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >
> > > I'm talking about the minor number.  The only thing that effects is
> > > that executables would pick up the new version if they have the old
> > > one in the path as well, no potential problems.
> >
> > Okay, but, what does that buy you?  One overwrites the old library, the
> > other creates one that will over-ride the old library ... either way, you
> > are using the new library, no?
>
> What happens when some libpq is in one directory, and another in a
> different directory, both in ld.so.conf.  Does it pick higher version of
> all available versions?

AFAIK it finds the first in order of directories listed in ld.so.conf.

>
>
> --
>   Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
>   pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
>   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
>   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Philip Warner
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.1.2 release
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Converting PL/SQL to PL/PGSQL