Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Yaacov Akiba Slama
Subject Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems
Date
Msg-id 3AFA5774.1010000@slamail.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello !
I am forwarding the following from lkml

It seems that the only case when XFS is slow is the 'rm -rf linux' 
[which can be considered as a good sign for linux]. For all other 
operation XFS is the winner.

YAS

<MessageFromLKML>
From: Ricardo Galli (gallir@uib.es)
Date: Wed May 09 2001 - 20:45:46 EDT

* Next message: clameter@lameter.com: "USB broken in 2.4.4? Serial 
Ricochet works, USB performance sucks."
    * Previous message: AmigaLinux A2232 Driver Project : "New Amiga 
Driver"    * Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> It would be great to see a table of ReiserFS/XFS/Ext2+index performance> results. Well, to make it really fair it
shouldbe Ext3+index so I'd> better add 'backport the patch to 2.2' or 'bug Stephen and friends to> hurry up' to my
to-dolist.
 

You can find a simple benchmark (an average of three samples) among reiser,
ext2, xfs and fat32 under Linux:

http://bulma.lug.net/body.phtml?nIdNoticia=626

Although is Spanish, the tables are easy to understand.

The benchmark was carried up by Guillem Cantallops, student of the
University of Balearics Islands and member or the local LUG...

BASIC WORDS ;-)
Escritura: Writing
Lectura: Reading
Borrado: Deletion
Copia: Copy
Extracción: Extraction

Regards,

--ricardo
http://m3d.uib.es/~gallir/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
</MessageFromLKML>


Bruce Momjian wrote:

>>I'm concearned about this because we are going to switch our
>>fist server to a Journaling FS (on Linux).  Searching and asking
>>I found out that for our short term work we need ReiserFS (it's
>>for a proxy server).  Put the interesting thing was that for
>>large (very large) files, everybody recomends XFS.  The drawback
>>of XFS is that it's very, very sloooow when deleting files.
>>
> 
> Why do all these file systems seem to have one major negative?
> 
> --
>   Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
>   pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
>   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
>   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
> 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: test@test.com
Date:
Subject: Re: AW: AW: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Odd results in SELECT