Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > Agreed. I mentioned to Keith I was going to clean it up before
> > > application. Here is the cleaned up patch.
> > >
> > > Hiroshi, what do you think?
> > >
> >
> > Hmm that's not what I mean. The patch essentially means
> > that the STMT_PREMATURE state is unnecessary. Well why is
> > the concept *PREMATURE* introduced ? What meaning does the
> > stuff related to the concept *PREMATURE* have ? IMHO we
> > have to reconsider from the first.
>
> Oh, so you need Keith to explain the patch. OK.
>
I got the following mail from Keith personally about
10 hours ago. I don't like the temporary fix. It also
loses the advantge of *PREMATURE* handling.
[A part of his mail]
> I'm not saying that our fix is the long-term solution
> to this problem but it does demonstrate the issue we
> found and a possible fix. What we were not sure of
> is what other ramifications are there with the fix we made.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
