Hey guys,
Has everyone forgotten PalmOS?
;->
+ Justin
Michelle Murrain wrote:
>
> On Thursday 03 May 2001 11:58 am, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> > GH <grasshacker@over-yonder.net> writes:
> > > On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 08:07:04PM +0100, some SMTP stream spewed forth:
> > > > I only have experience with Red Hat, Solaris 8 (intel), and LinuxPPC.
> > > > What do you see as the downside of running Red Hat? My intention is to
> > > > run RH 7.1, although I can surely be swayed if you can offer some
> > > > compelling FreeBSD benefits.
> > >
> > > FreeBSD is out-of-the-box more secure, more stable, and generally more
> > > enjoyable to work with than RedHat.
> >
> > Hardly. Now, could you stop your uniformed flamebaiting please?
> > FreeBSD is nice in some respects (and not in others), but coming with
> > FUD like you are doesn't do anyone any good.
>
> I hate to say it but saying that FreeBSD might be better than Red Hat is
> hardly flamebait or FUD. And it doesn't necessarily seem uninformed to me
> (why would he say it's more enjoyable if he wasn't informed - i.e. hadn't
> experienced it?).
>
> (disclaimer - I don't work for any OS company, and I don't use FreeBSD,
> although I've thought about it.)
>
> Michelle
> --
> ------------
> Michelle Murrain, Ph.D.
> President
> Norwottuck Technology Resources
> mpm@norwottuck.com
> http://www.norwottuck.com
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
