Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
Date
Msg-id 3AB1554B.AF34116E@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Well, that's exactly *why* we need an overridable default.  Or would you
> like to try to do some performance measurements in configure?

At this point I'm more comfortable with a compile-time option
(determined statically or in a configure compilation test, not a
performance test), rather than a GUC variable. But imho 7.1 will be nice
with either choice, and if you think that a variable will make it easier
for developers to do tuning from a distance (as opposed to having it
just confuse new users) then... ;)
                   - Thomas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alfred Perlstein
Date:
Subject: Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
Next
From: Philip Warner
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance monitor signal handler