Re: [Fwd: JDBC Timestamp problem] - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Joseph Shraibman
Subject Re: [Fwd: JDBC Timestamp problem]
Date
Msg-id 3A958368.2F89168D@selectacast.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to [Fwd: JDBC Timestamp problem]  (Antonio Fiol <fiol@w3ping.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
jdbc version don't follow postgres versions, so the jdbc drivers from
the 7.1 codebase should work with a 7.0 server.  Provided there aren't
any bugs in those jdbc drivers, of course.  Why are you using 7.0 when
7.0.3 is out?  I think some of the timestamp problems were fixed in
7.0.3.

Antonio Fiol wrote:
>
> Sorry, I sent the message to Peter only...
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: [JDBC] JDBC Timestamp problem
> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 18:08:55 +0100
> From: Antonio Fiol <fiol@w3ping.com>
> Organization: w3ping
> To: Peter T Mount <peter@retep.org.uk>
> References: <3A953F6D.1AADA5A8@w3ping.com> <982861598.3a95471e36517@webmail.retep.org.uk>
>
> > Yes, there's been a lot of problems with timestamps, mainly where it was
> > getting confused with timezone/millisecond variations. 99% of these have been
> > fixed in the 7.1 driver.
> >
> > (I say 99% as there is bound to be a senario we've missed out ;-) )
> >
> > Peter
>
> I downloaded the 7.0 three days ago!!!!
>
> Is there an RPM for the 7.1 stuff?
>
> Should I install all of the 7.1 packages, or should the JDBC driver be enough?
>
> If all of them are necessary, must I recreate my database, or can I upgrade
> cleanly, without touching to my data ?
>
> Thank you for answering that quickly !!!!
>
> Antonio Fiol
> W3ping

--
Joseph Shraibman
jks@selectacast.net
Increase signal to noise ratio.  http://www.targabot.com

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Peter T Mount
Date:
Subject: Re: JDBC Timestamp problem
Next
From: Philip Warner
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.1 items