Tom Lane wrote:
> However, that answers Lamar's complaint about needing a way to control
> the syslog level of messages. splogger might be more useful than logger
> for our purposes --- even if we have to carry it along with us. What's
> its license? A slight tweak of splogger to recognize our ERROR/FATAL/
> DEBUG prefixes might be just the thing ...
Ok, I can work with that. Last night I dreamed the solution in shell --
what a wicked pipeline..... Might want to change Nathan's pglogger
utility to pg_logger for consistency, though.
A quick and dirty solution that works is better than mucking around with
the core, particularly this close to release.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
