Home > mailing lists

Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From	David E. Wheeler
Subject	Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch
Date	October 8, 2009 16:53:37
Msg-id	3A7B55B9-7B88-408E-99AE-A4AD0E3A8578@kineticode.com Whole thread Raw
In response to	Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses	Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List	pgsql-hackers

Tree view

On Oct 8, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Jeff Davis wrote:

> It's just the call notation -- the function only needs to know what
> arguments it got for which parameters.

So they're still ordered? I'm thinking of PL/Perl here…

David

pgsql-hackers by date:

From: Robert Haas
Date: 08 October 2009, 16:50:54
Subject: Re: COPY enhancements

From: Tom Lane
Date: 08 October 2009, 16:57:47
Subject: Re: Writeable CTEs and side effects

Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Previous

Next