Re: Why PostgreSQL is not that popular as MySQL? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Elmar Haneke
Subject Re: Why PostgreSQL is not that popular as MySQL?
Date
Msg-id 3A3487AA.721CF484@haneke.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Re: Why PostgreSQL is not that popular as MySQL?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > The bottom line is that the marketing of PostgreSQL is not even close to
> > that of MySQL.  Thank god the code, community and support doesn't follow
> > suit!
>
> I think MySQL got a big start by migrating mSQL users years ago and
> having a compatibility module for mSQL.

One great advantage of mySQL (and mSQL) ist the low
connection-overhead. Especially in mSQL this was an explicit
design-goal.

In CGI-based WEB-environments it is very important that the time spent
for connecting the database is as low as possible. Time wasted there
cannot be autweight by fast SELECTS since many CGI do only very few
SQL-statements.

Using later WEB-techniques (as e.g. Servlets or Fast-CGI) this part
becomes less important since an single DB-connection can be kept open
across multiple WWW-requests. In applications where the connection is
kept open for a long time the connection overhead becomes
insignificant.

Elmar

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "George Johnson"
Date:
Subject: mysql issues
Next
From: Matthew
Date:
Subject: RE: Re: Re: Why PostgreSQL is not that popular as MySQL ?