Re: Horology regress test changed? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: Horology regress test changed?
Date
Msg-id 3A07A328.E4083699@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Horology regress test changed?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I'm seeing a whole bunch of miscompares in the horology test today.
> Is this stuff supposed to have changed behavior?

Yup. RTFCVSL :)

It is a result of fixing the date/time math across daylight savings time
boundaries. You will find that there is no longer an artifical one hour
offset in results when you add days, months, or years to a date or
timestamp.

I looked fairly carefully in the regression results before committing
the changes, but another pair of eyes always helps so let me know if you
notice anything funny...
                     - Thomas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Type resolution for operators
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: INTERVAL representation