Re: Unneccessary cmax in heap tuple ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From devik@cdi.cz
Subject Re: Unneccessary cmax in heap tuple ?
Date
Msg-id 39F80C01.897896C7@cdi.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Doesn't anyone around here run the regression tests on patches?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> In situations like SQL function calls, it may be necessary to suspend
> a table scan while we go off and do other commands, then come back and
> resume the table scan.  So there can be multiple scans with different
> command IDs in progress within a transaction.

Ohh yes .. you are right. Thanks for explanation.
devik



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: --enable-multibyte dies (UnixWare 7.1.1)/Current Sources
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: sanity of using -current?