Re: PL/java - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Zé Rui Marques
Subject Re: PL/java
Date
Msg-id 39BE0035-414A-4DC4-B2DB-C2DBFB2B778A@carrotincentives.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PL/java  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
List pgsql-general
Hi,

My concern is a purely commercial, in this case. 

We work only for “large” companies. Only telecommunications operators (more than 5 million subscribers)

In this environment the “IBM / SAP / Accenture” effect is very strong - “I chose the leader, it is not my fault that it failed”

So, having something like PL/java when it is not “supported” by anyone with a markeatable name is always a barrier. 

Furthermore, if it is not in the Postgres.org supported things, it will not be available in AWS RDS service, AWS Aurora, Azure xyz, Citus…, which limits our deployment options.

Thanks,


On 07-12-2020, at 14:45, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:

On 12/7/20 3:25 AM, Zé Rui Marques wrote:
Hi,
I am the lead architect in a small firm that develops a very specialised ETL platform.
Traditionally, we have used Oracle and PL-SQL, and we are now porting everything to Postgres.
All of our code outside of the database is java and I wiash that all of our code within the database to be also in java.
The PL/java “add-on” is not supported directly by Postgres.
I would like to ask if there is a plan to include it as an official procedural language. If so, when?

None that I have heard of. Even if the decision where to made today it would likely a couple of years before it would be included, so that is not going to help you. What is your concern?

Thanks,
*—*
*Zé Rui Marques*


--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Aravindhan Krishnan
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres-10 with FIPS
Next
From: Lars Vonk
Date:
Subject: Performance penalty during logical postgres replication