Brook Milligan wrote:
>
> See my other reply about what gets added: the problem is the rewrite
> rule name, as you guessed.
>
> Here's a patch that silently truncates the generated rule name.
>
What are the consequences of changing the NAMEDATALEN and recompiling?
Doesn't that seem like a better solution then to truncate the view name?
--
You can hit reply if you want "malcontent" is a legit email.
