Re: WIP: About CMake v2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From YUriy Zhuravlev
Subject Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Date
Msg-id 3993879.VcJEeiShpZ@dinodell
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: About CMake v2  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: WIP: About CMake v2  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thursday 26 November 2015 11:10:36 you wrote:
> Adding a new build
> dependency is bad enough; adding one that isn't easily available is a
> show-stopper.

If someone decided to compile from source Postgres rather than install from 
RPM then it will not be a problem as to build CMake.
On the one hand it is good that the GNU Make a stable and have not changed, 
but it can not last forever.

It is possible to make support for CMake 2.6 but now is not the time when you 
have to think about it. I'll come back to this when all the functionality will 
work.

Thanks. 
-- 
YUriy Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: What .gitignore files do in the tarball?
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2