Re: autovauum integration patch: Attempt #4 - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: autovauum integration patch: Attempt #4
Date
Msg-id 398.1090639524@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: autovauum integration patch: Attempt #4  ("Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>)
Responses Re: autovauum integration patch: Attempt #4
List pgsql-patches
"Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I'm not sure whether we can allow int8 columns in system tables, for
>> portability reasons.

> Someone will have to tell me if this is really a problem,

Depending on int8 to actually work is right out.

I'd go with float or double depending on your precision needs.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: autovauum integration patch: Attempt #4
Next
From: "Matthew T. O'Connor"
Date:
Subject: Re: autovauum integration patch: Attempt #4