Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof?
Date
Msg-id 3973586.1722611275@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof?  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof?
Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof?
List pgsql-hackers
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> <dons flameproof suit>
> Hmmm, and then have "leakproof_mode" = strict/lax/off where 'strict' is 
> current behavior, 'lax' allows the 'maybe's to get pushed down, and 
> 'off' ignores the leakproof attribute entirely and pushes down anything 
> that merits being pushed?
> </dons flameproof suit>

So in other words, we might as well just remove RLS.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof?
Next
From: Matthias van de Meent
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel CREATE INDEX for GIN indexes