"Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com> writes:
> I periodically hear rumblings about this behavior as well. At the
> very least, it certainly ought to be documented if it isn't yet. I
> wouldn't mind trying my hand at that. Perhaps we could also add a new
> configuration parameter if users really want to take the performance
> hit.
A sequence's cache length is already configurable, no?
regards, tom lane
