Re: Server process exited with status 139 (meaning?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: Server process exited with status 139 (meaning?)
Date
Msg-id 3956EA80.730B5D8F@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Server process exited with status 139 (meaning?)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Server process exited with status 139 (meaning?)
List pgsql-hackers
> I'll assume you tried my latest typo-free version on an HP box after
> posting this and got the same results (i.e., nothing).  Maybe someone
> else would care to verify on a Linux box?  I'm on RH 6.2 with dual
> PIII's...

I see the latest being formally rejected down in the Executor. So
something is better than in the beta, but the plan being generated is
not quite right apparently.
               - Thomas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ed Loehr
Date:
Subject: Re: ExecInitIndexScan: both left and right ops are rel-vars
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ExecInitIndexScan: both left and right ops are rel-vars