Re: Big 7.1 open items - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chris Bitmead
Subject Re: Big 7.1 open items
Date
Msg-id 39518B7C.F76108FD@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Big 7.1 open items  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Big 7.1 open items  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Big 7.1 open items  (Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>)
Re: Big 7.1 open items  ("Philip J. Warner" <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
Re: Big 7.1 open items  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > The symlink solution where the actual symlink location is not stored
> > > in the database is certainly abstract.  We store that info in the file
> > > system, which is where it belongs.  We only query the symlink location
> > > when we need it for database location dumping.
> >
> > how would that work? would pg_dump dump the tablespace locations or not?
> >
> 
> pg_dump would recreate a CREATE TABLESPACE command:
> 
>         printf("CREATE TABLESPACE %s USING %s", loc, symloc);
> 
> where symloc would be SELECT symloc(loc) and return the value into a
> variable that is used by pg_dump.  The backend would do the lstat() and
> return the value to the client.

I'm wondering if pg_dump should store the location of the tablespace. If
your machine dies, you get a new machine to re-create the database, you
may not want the tablespace in the same spot. And text-editing a
gigabyte file would be extremely painful.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Makefile.global is kind of a pain
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items