Re: Implicit conversion bugaboo in beta2? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Implicit conversion bugaboo in beta2?
Date
Msg-id 3934.1063605594@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Implicit conversion bugaboo in beta2?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Implicit conversion bugaboo in beta2?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>> Uh, yeah, but we did in 7.2 and 7.3 as well... count() hasn't been
>> int4 since 7.1...

> Hmmm ... can't be 7.2.   The query is taken from a production database written
> for 7.2; I'd have noticed the BIGINT problem before now.  Either that, or in
> 7.2 we were doing implicit conversion from BIGINT to INT for function calls?

That could be --- I don't recall exactly when we decided implicit
bigint->int conversion was a bad idea ...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Implicit conversion bugaboo in beta2?
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Implicit conversion bugaboo in beta2?