Re: improved DefElem list processing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: improved DefElem list processing
Date
Msg-id 392d0dfb-20af-0a3a-9d86-5e87dbc57d88@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: improved DefElem list processing  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 8/4/16 2:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> +1 on the general idea, but I wonder if it's a problem that you replaced
> an O(N) check with an O(N^2) check.  I don't think there are any commands
> that would be likely to have so many options that this would become a
> serious issue, but ...

I'll run some tests.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: handling unconvertible error messages
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: improved DefElem list processing