Re: 7.0 RPM? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Karl DeBisschop
Subject Re: 7.0 RPM?
Date
Msg-id 39196EB6.8CA5F7AA@alert.infoplease.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to 7.0 RPM?  ("J. Atwood" <jatwood@bwanazulia.com>)
List pgsql-general
Thomas Lockhart wrote:

> > > 7.0RC5 is database-compatible with the final, earlier betas are *not*.
> > > You can use pg_upgrade to update from any 6.5-or-later version if you
> > > are feeling adventurous, but I'd definitely suggest making a backup
> > > first in case things go wrong and you have to initdb and restore.
> > Sorry if I was not clear.  The RPMs I prepared use Lamar Owen spec from RC1,
> > but use final release sources.  Upgrading from final release to final release
> > should not be a problem, I think.  I only recommended it because I understand
> > from his recent posts sthat Lamar has many inprovements to the RPM install
> > script that I have not taken advantage of.
>
> Tom's point is that RC5 is *not* database-compatible with previous
> release candidates due to a last minute bug fix in the location of
> group table indices.
>
> So anything earlier than RC5 needs (at least) a pg_upgrade, and (for
> me) preferably a full dump/initdb/restore cycle.
>
>                         - Thomas
>
> --
> Thomas Lockhart                         lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
> South Pasadena, California

My point is that my RPMS use the final release sources

Karl


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ned Lilly
Date:
Subject: Re: Steering committee responce to Great Bridge LLC
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.0 RPM?