Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Sure, but I was responding to your assertion that there's no case in
> which --load-via-partition-root could cause a restore failure. I'm not
> sure that's accurate.
Perhaps it's not, but it's certainly far less likely to cause a restore
failure than the behavior I want to replace.
More to the current point perhaps, I doubt that it's likely enough to
cause a restore failure to justify the existing docs warning. There
may have been a time when the warning was justified, but I don't believe
it today.
regards, tom lane
