"Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> 2008/11/6 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> RETURN isn't one of them.
> It should be enhanced - my initial proposal of return query expected
> so return query is last statement, that isn't now. So we could add
> this check there.
Well, changing the semantics of an already-released statement carries a
risk of breaking existing apps that aren't expecting it to change FOUND.
So I'd want to see a pretty strong case why this is important --- not
just that it didn't meet someone's didn't-read-the-manual expectation.
regards, tom lane
