Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade
Date
Msg-id 3901843.1659116952@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> That's also my preference, so committed and back-patched to v15.

crake has been failing its cross-version-upgrade tests [1] since
this went in:

log files for step xversion-upgrade-REL9_4_STABLE-HEAD:
==~_~===-=-===~_~== /home/andrew/bf/root/upgrade.crake/HEAD/REL9_4_STABLE-amcheck-1.log ==~_~===-=-===~_~==
heap table "regression.pg_catalog.pg_largeobject", block 0, offset 7:
    xmin 7707 precedes relation freeze threshold 0:14779
heap table "regression.pg_catalog.pg_largeobject", block 201, offset 5:
    xmin 8633 precedes relation freeze threshold 0:14779

I'm not very sure what to make of that, but it's failed identically
four times in four attempts.

            regards, tom lane

[1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=crake&dt=2022-07-28%2020%3A33%3A20



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Oversight in slab.c SlabContextCreate(), initial memory allocation size is not populated to context->mem_allocated
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Should fix a comment referring to stats collector?