Re: Postgresqlism & Vacuum? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ed Loehr
Subject Re: Postgresqlism & Vacuum?
Date
Msg-id 38F73A72.88CDAD95@austin.rr.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgresqlism & Vacuum?  (Andrew Snow <als@giskard.fl.net.au>)
List pgsql-general
Andrew Snow wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Thomas wrote:
>
> > For large 24x7 installations, it's impossible to vacuum nightly because when
> > postgresql is vacuuming the table is locked up, to the end-user the database
> > has already hung.
>
> That's right. I complained about this in a discussion with a Postgresql
> developer, who assured me they were working towards a fix.  I really don't
> care whether the vacuuming is fixed so that it does not lock the table
> completely, or that vacuuming becomes say, a once-a-month or less frequent
> operation. For some reason everyone who is used to working with PostgreSQL
> accepts the fact that you have to vacuum nightly - to outsiders it seems
> like a major flaw with the system.

The vacuum requirement is a bummer.  After working with pg for 9 months
now, I consider it a major opportunity for improvement.  I wish I had the
time...

Regards,
Ed Loehr

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ed Loehr
Date:
Subject: Re: database file size bloat
Next
From: Stephen J Lombardo
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresqlism & Vacuum?