Re: [GENERAL] Re: [General] pgsql on win95 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Chmara
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Re: [General] pgsql on win95
Date
Msg-id 38B40921.B61B25B7@opus1.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Re: [General] pgsql on win95  (Marten Feldtmann <marten@feki.toppoint.de>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Re: [General] pgsql on win95  (root <root@feki.toppoint.de>)
List pgsql-general
Marten Feldtmann wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 21 Feb 2000 Elmar.Haneke@gmx.de wrote:
> >
> >       Is there really an interest in spending the extra money for a
> > Windows license to build a less reliable database server?
> >
>
>  Hmmm, try to think about an application, which normally runs on a server,
> but then is also wanted (with much less data) on a notebook ...

I'm writing this email to you from a notebook. Running Linux. And Postgres.
:-) So, it's already being done (Notebooks aren't the issue here, I believe
it's an issue of OS choices).

-Bop

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Jeffrey D. Gordon"
Date:
Subject:
Next
From: Andrew Rawnsley
Date:
Subject: Odd delete behavior in 7.0beta1