Re: Commitfest 2023-03 starting tomorrow! - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: Commitfest 2023-03 starting tomorrow!
Date
Msg-id 385A9D60-10A1-47ED-A65C-53A09FF99D6A@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Commitfest 2023-03 starting tomorrow!  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On 22 Mar 2023, at 10:39, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

> Personally, if a patch isn't rebased up to the minute doesn't bother me at all.  It's easy to check out as of when
theemail was sent (or extra bonus points for using git format-patch --base).  Now, rebasing every month or so is nice,
butdaily rebases during a commit fest are almost more distracting than just leaving it. 

+1.  As long as the patch is rebased and builds/tests green when the CF starts
I'm not too worried about not having it always rebased during the CF.  If
resolving the conflicts are non-trivial/obvious then of course, but if only to
stay recent and avoid fuzz in applying then it's more distracting.

--
Daniel Gustafsson




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Yugo NAGATA
Date:
Subject: Re: About a recently-added permission-related error message
Next
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format