Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 4:50 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> There is a second problem that I am going to hold your feet to the
>> fire about:
>> (lldb) p sizeof(SharedInvalidationMessage)
>> (unsigned long) $1 = 24
> Also, I don't really know what problem you think it's going to cause
> if that structure gets bigger. If we increased the size from 16 bytes
> even all the way to 32 or 64 bytes, what negative impact do you think
> that would have?
Maybe it wouldn't have any great impact. I don't know, but I don't
think it's incumbent on me to measure that. You or the patch author
should have had a handle on that question *before* committing.
regards, tom lane
