Re: [INTERFACES] PgAccess 0.98 and libpq.so.2 - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces
From | Nigel Berkeley |
---|---|
Subject | Re: [INTERFACES] PgAccess 0.98 and libpq.so.2 |
Date | |
Msg-id | 383EC116.B739B3C9@incagold.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | PgAccess 0.98 and libpq.so.2 ("Nigel Berkeley" <nige@incagold.com>) |
Responses |
Re: [INTERFACES] PgAccess 0.98 and libpq.so.2
|
List | pgsql-interfaces |
You were right all a long... I did a find (instead of locate) and it found some older libpgtcl.so libs in the /usr/local/lib dir. I ran RPM on them to see what packaged installed them but they didnt belong to anything. So I deleted them, ran ldconfig and pgaccess worked! Sorry for being so anoying and thanks alot for all ur elp, Nige Lamar Owen wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Nigel Berkeley wrote: > > run pgaccess, or worse still theres going to be A LOT of people that > > arnt able to use pgaccess at all because they dont know what the > > problem is! > > > > Constantin, if it is the case of not having the old lib, are you > > planning to update pgaccess to use libpq.so.2? > > The pgaccess tcl/tk script does not require any library other than libpgtcl.so > -- it's libpgtcl.so that requires a specific libpq.so. > > Checking my installation of PostgreSQL (that I installed from sources via > building the RPM set), libpgtcl.so from 6.5.3 does NOT require libpq.so.1 -- it > requires libpq.so.2) (the output from 'ldd /usr/lib/libpgtcl.so' will tell you > what libraries it depends upon -- here's the output of 'ls -l > /usr/lib/libpgtcl.*' , followed by the output of 'ldd /usr/lib/libpgtcl.so' -- > note that your installation of PostgreSQL has different directories for these > -- and make double sure that there is no other libpgtcl.so on your system in a > library search path): > -------------ls -l /usr/lib/libpgtcl.* ------------ > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 27260 Nov 4 22:30 /usr/lib/libpgtcl.a > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Oct 9 23:11 /usr/lib/libpgtcl.so -> libpgtcl.so.2.0 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Oct 9 23:11 /usr/lib/libpgtcl.so.2 -> libpgtcl.so.2.0 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 28276 Nov 4 22:30 /usr/lib/libpgtcl.so.2.0 > ---------------------------------------- > ------------ldd /usr/lib/libpgtcl.so------------- > libpq.so.2.0 => /usr/lib/libpq.so.2.0 (0x4000d000) > libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/libcrypt.so.1 (0x4001a000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40047000) > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x80000000) > ---------------------------------------- > > I have built RPM's for 6.5.x many different times on RedHat 5.2 and RedHat 6.1, > and I have never had this problem you are having. Building the RPM's, as I > have said, involves configure'ing, make'ing, and 'make install'ing just like > you have done, just with a slightly different set of configure options (in > particular, prefix is set to a different value than the norm). Make double > and triple sure that the old PostgreSQL 6.3.2 RPM's are not installed -- or > that artifacts from the 6.3.2 RPM install aren't left on the disk. > > Summary: if you have a version of libpgtcl.so on your system (look for > /usr/lib/libpgtcl.* -- the 6.3.2 RPM shipped a /usr/lib/pgtcl.so.1, that was > symlinked from /usr/lib/libpgtcl.so, IIRC) that requires libpq.so.1 (which the > version of libpgtcl.so that ships with 6.5.3 does NOT), then this error will > show. > > A copy of the 'rpm -qa' output from your machine would be helpful -- send it to > me directly, and not to the list, as the output is large. > > HTH > > -- > Lamar Owen > WGCR Internet Radio > 1 Peter 4:11 > > ************
pgsql-interfaces by date: