Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL
Date
Msg-id 3836.1253150349@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> What we need is VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY.

VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY is a contradiction in terms.  Wishing it were
possible doesn't make it so.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch