Re: Proposed changes to DTrace probe implementation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Proposed changes to DTrace probe implementation
Date
Msg-id 3821.1204044165@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposed changes to DTrace probe implementation  (Robert Lor <Robert.Lor@Sun.COM>)
Responses Re: Proposed changes to DTrace probe implementation  (Robert Lor <Robert.Lor@Sun.COM>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Lor <Robert.Lor@Sun.COM> writes:
>> * This is unrelated to making DTrace work on Leopard, but I'd like to 
>> propose that we split the probes into generic database and Postgres 
>> specific providers, called "database" and "postgresql" respectively. 
>> Other databases will be adding DTrace probes as well, and we want to 
>> use "database" as the provider for probes that are common to all 
>> databases.

I'm unconvinced that there will be any probes that are common to all
databases.  I'd skip this part...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump additional options for performance