Re: minimal update - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Glaesemann
Subject Re: minimal update
Date
Msg-id 381FC610-9CD2-4885-BE3A-66F4E5DA3744@seespotcode.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: minimal update  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: minimal update  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Nov 2, 2007, at 13:44 , Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> Ah. Good. Thanks, that's the piece I was missing.

What would be the disadvantages of always doing this, i.e., just  
making this part of the normal update path in the backend? I'd think  
it should save on unnecessarily dead tuples as well.

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: A small rant about coding style for backend functions
Next
From: Zdenek Kotala
Date:
Subject: Re: New tzdata available