Re: [GENERAL] users in Postgresql - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Marcin Grondecki
Subject Re: [GENERAL] users in Postgresql
Date
Msg-id 381F242F.E0BC2846@mtl.pl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] users in Postgresql  (postgres@taifun.interface-business.de)
List pgsql-general
IMHO because this is _current_ implementation issue
you cannot be sure that some/all system catalogs will not change
in the future - making your program _very_ unhappy :)


postgres@taifun.interface-business.de wrote:
>
> > Btw., although direct UPDATEs to pg_shadow will seemingly succeed, you do
> > not want to do that. That's a bug.
>
> Peter, would you explain your statement please!
>
> Why somebody is able to UPDATE pg_shadow to create an user if that's a bug?
> And _why_ that's a bug?
>
> Gerald
>
> ************

--
Marcin Grondecki
ojciec@mtl.pl

*** I'm not a complete idiot - some parts are missing

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Oleg Broytmann
Date:
Subject: Postgres database on RAM disk - the article in LinuxFocus
Next
From: Patrick Robin
Date:
Subject: portion of constraints regression test fails