-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Brendan Jurd" writes:
>
> > Not really. I'm claiming that, to the submitter, a response that
> > hasn't happened yet and a response that is never coming look pretty
> > much identical.
>
> I understand, but that seems a bit offtopic seeing that this whole
> thread is about how to guarantee that we don't actually forget about
> any patches or bug reports.
>
> If you want to make the responses faster, then you gotta pony up some
> genuine human resources to deal with the problems. Feel free to join
> Bruce and me in the trenches.
>
I think we've gotten some wires crossed. We are, in effect, arguing
the same point. Upthread (and previously in other threads) I agreed
heartily with Heikki's comment that patch submitters should be putting
their work in the queue themselves.
I've been saying that I would happily add my own patches to the wiki.
That *is* contributing human resources to the problem. And it is a
simple solution to my complaint above; that it can be a long time
before your patch moves into the queue. Anyone who doesn't want to
wait for the Bruce Method to take effect can just do it for
themselves.
Cheers,
BJ
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://getfiregpg.org
iD8DBQFH/uPp5YBsbHkuyV0RAk/9AJsGjLVYpBx9J3zo6P1D8UsWqlS9FQCg1ZVw
py7s/5M+KJmkSvAH/osx9tA=
=77ab
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
