On 3/14/19 3:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> On 3/14/19 12:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> So far, no other failures ...
>> I have replicated this on my Msys2 test system.
>> I assume it's a bug in the mingw math library. I think jacana is the
>> only currently reporting mingw member :-( The MSVC members appear to be
>> happy.
>> I have several releases of the mingw64 toolsets installed on jacana -
>> I'll try an earlier version to see if it makes a difference.
> Yeah, it would be interesting to know whether it's consistent across
> different mingw versions.
Tried with mingw64-gcc-5.4.0 (jacana is currently on 8.1.0). Same result.
>
> So far, though, jacana is still the only buildfarm animal that's having
> trouble with those tests as of c015f853b. I want to wait another day or
> so in hopes of getting more reports from stragglers. But assuming that
> that stays true, I do not feel any need to try to work around jacana's
> issues. We already have proof of two deficiencies in their
> hyoerbolic-function code, and considering the tiny number of test cases
> we've tried, it'd be folly to think there are only two. I don't want
> to embark on a project to clean that up for the sake of one substandard
> implementation.
>
> I feel therefore that what we should do (barring new evidence) is either
>
> 1. Remove all the inf/nan test cases for the hyoerbolic functions, on
> the grounds that they're not really worth expending buildfarm cycles on
> in the long run; or
>
> 2. Just comment out the one failing test, with a note about why.
>
> I haven't got a strong preference as to which. Thoughts?
>
>
2. would help us memorialize the problem.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
